By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Noah and Emma still top Social Security's list of most popular names in America
3a145ed1b45d6c5f1c12920ac0776cc928ed49f3f81e57886e088beeebe9462d
Noah and Emma were the most popular names given to babies in 2016, a position they held the year before, as well. - photo by Lois M Collins
Noah and Emma were the most popular baby names in America in 2016, according to the Social Security Administration's annual reckoning. Noah has topped the list of boy names since 2013, while Emma held on to its No. 1 spot since she bested Sophia in 2014 for girl names.

The boy names rounding out the top five are William, Liam, Mason and James. The other top names for girls are Olivia, Ava, Sophia and Isabella.

The Social Security Administration has published the list since 1997, when actuary Michael W. Shackleford compiled the first list. But the agency's popular names lists going back several decades are available.

Mapping the most popular name for each state shows some interesting patterns. Ava plays big in the south, for example, while Mia's the main moniker for girls in California, Nevada and New Mexico. Oliver and Liam are at the top in scattered states, while William is primarily popular in the South.

Utah has one of the really striking top name pairings: For boys, Oliver. For girls, Olivia. It would certainly simplify naming boy-girl twins.

There are a lot of different ways to play the name game and the Social Security Administration offers several of them, including a list of the "most improved" names, which are those that jumped the most in popularity between 2015 and 2016. Kylo moved from No. 3269 to No. 901 the biggest leap among boys. For girls, the biggest surge in popularity was for Kehlani, from No. 3359 to No. 872. Royalty and Creed made similar but less dramatic leaps.

Jonael lost the most ground, while Caitlin and three other variations of the name were the top four for losing popularity among girl names.

In explaining the rankings, the administration notes that "different spellings of similar names are not combined. For example, the names Caitlin, Caitlyn, Kaitlin, Kaitlyn, Kaitlynn, Katelyn, and Katelynn are considered separate names and each has its own rank." None of them made the top 20.

Solid, time-tested names on the girls' top 20 list include Abigail (No. 7), Emily (8), Charlotte (9), Elizabeth (13), Evelyn (15), Grace (19) and Victoria (20). The more traditional names on boys' list were Jacob (4), William (5), Ethan (6), James (7), Alexander (8), Michael (9) and Benjamin (10). Daniel (12), Matthew (15) and David (18) remained in the top 20.

A number of names haven't budged, including Hezekiah, which sat steady at 677 for boys, while Rivka stayed No. 860 for girls.
Sign up for our E-Newsletters
How to avoid 'sharenting' and other paparazzi parenting habits
ce406c66b9871a104ac24256a687e4821d75680dcfc89d9e5398939543f7f88f
A recent study revealed parents often spend up to two hours staging a single photo of his or her child to post online. - photo by Amy Iverson
Before having kids, some people just dont appreciate their friends baby posts. But after having a child of their own, three fourths of new parents jump right on the parental social media bandwagon. If you have become a member of this group, there are some rules to follow for posting responsibly.

Much of a parents worry is how to teach their children to use social media responsibly. We talk with our kids about privacy, oversharing, and setting restrictions on their devices to keep them safe. But parents themselves need to look in the digital mirror once in a while. Before having children, it doesnt take as much effort to think about what to post online. Its up to us to decide what we share about our own lives. But once you become a parent, there are many questions to think about regarding what is appropriate to post about your kids on social media.

In a recent survey, kids clothing subscription company Mac and Mia surveyed 2000 new parents to find out how they are documenting their kids lives on social media, and what concerns they may have.

First of all, people without children seem to feel a bit differently about the onslaught of baby pictures online than those who are parents. 18 percent of people say before they had kids, they were annoyed by their friends baby posts. But after having children of their own, 73 percent admit they post progress pictures of their little ones every single month.

Not only are new parents letting the world know each time their baby is a month older, but they are posting about their kids every few days or so. Men and women report they post 6-7 times per month about their baby.

And while 70 percent of new parents say the benefit of using social media is how easy it is to help family and friends feel involved, there are some downsides. Here are a few tips to avoid the pitfall of becoming paparazzi parents.

Dont miss the moment

In the Mac and Mia survey, some parents admitted to spending up to two hours to get the perfect shot of their baby. That seems a little extreme. New and old parents alike should be careful about spending so much time taking pictures and videos that they dont enjoy the moment. Years ago, I decided to never live an experience through my phone. A study by Linda Henkel, a psychology professor at Fairfield University in Connecticut, found that when people took pictures of objects in an art museum, they didnt remember the objects as well as if they simply observed them.

This photo-taking impairment effect can happen to parents as well. If we are so consumed by getting the perfect photo, we can miss out on the moment all together, and our memory of it will suffer.

Dont forget about privacy

60 percent of couples say they have discussed rules and boundaries for posting their babys photos, according to the Mac and Mia survey. Even so, men are 34 percent more likely to publish baby posts on public accounts. If parents are concerned about their childrens privacy, keeping photos off of public accounts is a given.

In the Washington Post, Stacey Steinberg, a legal skills professor at the University of Florida, and Bahareh Keith, a Portland pediatrician, wrote that sharing too much information about kids online puts them at risk. They write that all that sharenting can make it easier for data thieves to target out kids for identity theft. Check that your privacy settings are where they should be and never share identifying information like full names and birth dates.

Dont be paparazzi parents

36 percent of parents say they take issue when their childs photo is posted online by someone else. Responsible social media users will always ask permission before posting a photo of another child. But parents should also think about whether their own children will take issue with their own posted photos a few years down the road.

When parents are constantly snapping pictures and throwing them on social media, it can be easy to forget to pause and make sure the post is appropriate. I always use the billboard example with my kids. I ask them to picture whatever they are posting going up on a billboard in our neighborhood. If they are okay with that, then their post is probably fine. Parents should ask themselves this same question when posting about their children. But they should also ask themselves if their child would be OK with this post on a billboard in 15 years. If it would cause embarrassment or humiliation, it might be best to keep it private.

Once children reach an appropriate age, parents should include them in the process of deciding what pictures are OK to post. Researchers at the University of Michigan surveyed 10- to 17-year-olds and found children believe their parents should ask permission more than parents think they should. The kids in the survey said sharing happy family moments, or accomplishments in sports, school and hobbies is fine. But when the post is negative (like when a child is disciplined) or embarrassing (think naked baby pictures or messy hair), kids say to keep it off social media.
Latest Obituaries