By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Don't fall for old retail tricks just because you're shopping online
fa5a84c9a358938b1d2b141a2239ecd9b6a4bf530a224c06576c2a170a0f941c
Have you ever thought a sale was too good to be true? That's probably because retailers inflate the list price for items to make you feel like you're getting a better deal than you are. - photo by Sam Turner
Many Americans are turning to online retailers, not just because of convenience and selection, but because they expect to find a deal.

If it seems like online retailers like Amazon always have sales, that's because they do. In fact, items are on sale so frequently that some have started to question whether the original list price was ever the price at all.

The New York Times explains that the list price is losing its meaning, and in some cases only exists to give shoppers the illusion of a bargain.

The Times gives the recent example of a Le Creuset brand skillet. While listed prices on various websites varied from $250 to $285, all retailers offered the skillet for a "discounted" price of $200.

As it turns out, Le Creuset's own website sells the skillet for the regular retail price of $200. All the other listed prices were inflated to offer a false sale price.

You must be thinking: that seems unfair! Isn't it against the law?

It is sort of.

The Federal Trade Commission has a guideline about deceptive pricing, reports NBC News, that retailers may advertise a list price as long as it represents a "bona fide price at which the article was offered to the public on a regular basis for a reasonably substantial period of time."

But the FTC has no ruling as to what constitutes a "substantial period of time."

"It's an area of enforcement that's been left to the states," FTC head of enforcement James Kohm told NBC.

Some states have decided to crack down on false advertising, even giving specific timelines for list prices. California, for example, requires that the list price was "the prevailing market price" within the last three months in order for an item to be advertised as "on sale."

That's why there have been a number of class-action lawsuits against retailers in California.

In late 2013, online retailer Overstock.com was sued for $6.8 million in California for falsely inflating its list prices, report The New York Times.

But false sale prices is not a new sales tactic, nor is it unique to online retailers. Traditional retailers have been caught using the same tactics.

In 2014, JC Penney was exposed for its deceptive sales practices after Florida employee Bob Blatchford came forward, reported the Huffington Post.

Blatchford details teams of employees going around the store doubling prices on certain items before a big sale. They would then offer discounts for the sale, but sometimes the discounts were less than 50 percent off.

"Not only was it a fake sale, but they were actually paying more than they would have been previously," Blatchford told HuffPost.

JC Penney has since been sued for running a massive, years-long, pervasive campaign of false sale prices and has paid a $50 million settlement to shoppers in California, reports the New York Times.

Competitors like Kohl's and Men's Wearhouse have faced similar lawsuits.

In an even more recent example, MONEY warned against liquidation sales after Sports Authority announced its bankruptcy on Tuesday.

While going-out-of-business sales often boast big savings, in reality they are not the best place to find a deal.

MONEY says that store closings are often handled by third-party liquidation firms, and the liquidator's goal is to make as much money as possible: usually by starting with only small discounts, and increasing savings only as merchandise becomes less available.

For instance, when Borders was liquidated in 2011, 19 out of 25 items examined were actually more expensive than their original prices. When items were discounted, it wasn't by much.

MONEY recommends that if you do go to store-closing sales, compare and price check like you normally would and check price tags to see if they have been tampered with.

Fortunately, online shoppers will largely avoid going-out-of-business tactics and other old retail tricks like the bait-and-switch.

Ironically, the Internet makes it much easier to price-check and validate sale prices. Rather than having to travel from one store to another, shoppers can simply make a few clicks to compare prices.

As consumers wise up to these deceptive advertising practices, online retailers may have to come up with new strategies to keep their attention.
Sign up for our E-Newsletters
How to avoid 'sharenting' and other paparazzi parenting habits
ce406c66b9871a104ac24256a687e4821d75680dcfc89d9e5398939543f7f88f
A recent study revealed parents often spend up to two hours staging a single photo of his or her child to post online. - photo by Amy Iverson
Before having kids, some people just dont appreciate their friends baby posts. But after having a child of their own, three fourths of new parents jump right on the parental social media bandwagon. If you have become a member of this group, there are some rules to follow for posting responsibly.

Much of a parents worry is how to teach their children to use social media responsibly. We talk with our kids about privacy, oversharing, and setting restrictions on their devices to keep them safe. But parents themselves need to look in the digital mirror once in a while. Before having children, it doesnt take as much effort to think about what to post online. Its up to us to decide what we share about our own lives. But once you become a parent, there are many questions to think about regarding what is appropriate to post about your kids on social media.

In a recent survey, kids clothing subscription company Mac and Mia surveyed 2000 new parents to find out how they are documenting their kids lives on social media, and what concerns they may have.

First of all, people without children seem to feel a bit differently about the onslaught of baby pictures online than those who are parents. 18 percent of people say before they had kids, they were annoyed by their friends baby posts. But after having children of their own, 73 percent admit they post progress pictures of their little ones every single month.

Not only are new parents letting the world know each time their baby is a month older, but they are posting about their kids every few days or so. Men and women report they post 6-7 times per month about their baby.

And while 70 percent of new parents say the benefit of using social media is how easy it is to help family and friends feel involved, there are some downsides. Here are a few tips to avoid the pitfall of becoming paparazzi parents.

Dont miss the moment

In the Mac and Mia survey, some parents admitted to spending up to two hours to get the perfect shot of their baby. That seems a little extreme. New and old parents alike should be careful about spending so much time taking pictures and videos that they dont enjoy the moment. Years ago, I decided to never live an experience through my phone. A study by Linda Henkel, a psychology professor at Fairfield University in Connecticut, found that when people took pictures of objects in an art museum, they didnt remember the objects as well as if they simply observed them.

This photo-taking impairment effect can happen to parents as well. If we are so consumed by getting the perfect photo, we can miss out on the moment all together, and our memory of it will suffer.

Dont forget about privacy

60 percent of couples say they have discussed rules and boundaries for posting their babys photos, according to the Mac and Mia survey. Even so, men are 34 percent more likely to publish baby posts on public accounts. If parents are concerned about their childrens privacy, keeping photos off of public accounts is a given.

In the Washington Post, Stacey Steinberg, a legal skills professor at the University of Florida, and Bahareh Keith, a Portland pediatrician, wrote that sharing too much information about kids online puts them at risk. They write that all that sharenting can make it easier for data thieves to target out kids for identity theft. Check that your privacy settings are where they should be and never share identifying information like full names and birth dates.

Dont be paparazzi parents

36 percent of parents say they take issue when their childs photo is posted online by someone else. Responsible social media users will always ask permission before posting a photo of another child. But parents should also think about whether their own children will take issue with their own posted photos a few years down the road.

When parents are constantly snapping pictures and throwing them on social media, it can be easy to forget to pause and make sure the post is appropriate. I always use the billboard example with my kids. I ask them to picture whatever they are posting going up on a billboard in our neighborhood. If they are okay with that, then their post is probably fine. Parents should ask themselves this same question when posting about their children. But they should also ask themselves if their child would be OK with this post on a billboard in 15 years. If it would cause embarrassment or humiliation, it might be best to keep it private.

Once children reach an appropriate age, parents should include them in the process of deciding what pictures are OK to post. Researchers at the University of Michigan surveyed 10- to 17-year-olds and found children believe their parents should ask permission more than parents think they should. The kids in the survey said sharing happy family moments, or accomplishments in sports, school and hobbies is fine. But when the post is negative (like when a child is disciplined) or embarrassing (think naked baby pictures or messy hair), kids say to keep it off social media.
Latest Obituaries